Vincenzi v. Morgan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that law firm that charged claimant for legal services done to reopen compensation claim but did not seek board approval for the charged fee “had no right to charge” client under AS 23.30.145
• concluding Board correctly treated petition to “reopen” claims as petition for modification
• reversing small claims judgment for attorneys who had tried to reopen workers' compensation claim because the fee was \in respect to a claim\ and had not been approved by Board
• proceeding under this statute “invokes the Board’s jurisdiction over the original claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).