Vincent v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the suppression of evidence is required where officers, even after closer visual inspection, are unable to identify the contraband as such without removing it from its container which was in plain view
• holding that the suppression of evidence is required where officers, even after closer visual inspection, are unable to identify the contraband as such without removing it from its container which was in plain view

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Scott v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-09-10· cited 14×
• Durden v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-02-07· cited 9×
• State v. Field
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-09-22· cited 7×
• Wise v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-09-13· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carroll v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-06-20· cited 16×
• Fuqua v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1977-06-08· cited 12×
• State v. Key
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-10-25· cited 8×
• State v. Estrado
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-04-19· cited 7×
• Fluker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-06-28· cited 5×
• Barlow v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-01-18· cited 3×