Vincent v. Heckler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that only significant, probative evidence needs to be discussed
• explaining that an ALJ is not required to discuss all the evidence 21 presented, but must explain the rejection of uncontroverted medical evidence, as well 22 as significant probative evidence
• holding a controverted medical opinion evidence was neither significant nor probative
• “Only disabilities existing before [the date last insured] can trigger insurance 2 benefits.”
• “Only disabilities existing before [the date last 19 insured] can trigger insurance benefits.”
• \After- the-fact psychiatric diagnoses are notoriously unreliable.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).