Vincent v. Haycraft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allegedly defamatory statements by pharmacist to patient were protected by qualified privilege because the “apparent purpose of the statements was to inform the customers about the physician who wrote the prescription”
• also noting that “pharmacists have a duty to provide competent advice to customers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).