Skip to main content
· 3/31/1994

Vincent v. Consolidated Operating Co.

Citations

  • 17 F.3d 782
  • 28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 499
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5958
  • 1994 WL 81730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An untimely Rule 59(e) motion does not toll the running of the thirty-day clock to appeal to this Court.”
  • “The district court is powerless to rule on an untimely Rule 59(e) motion.”
  • “We pause briefly to address the matter of our own jurisdiction in this case. Although neither party has raised the issue, we must do so sua sponte if we perceive any possible defect in our jurisdiction.”
  • “Service by mail is complete upon mailing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wisdom, King, Garwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.