Vincent Sicurella v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reaffirming an earlier holding that “§ 844(h)’s requirement of consecutive sentencing does apply to fire-related felonies”
• relying on \any other term of imprisonment\ language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).