Vincent Murphy Chevrolet Company, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that state law may be invoked in the application of language of the QTA to specific facts
• observing that the petitioners’ view of accrual could “extend the limitations period indefinitely”
• declining to toll statute of limitations based upon changed conditions; restrictions contained in 1965 quitclaim deeds were enforceable
• looking to state law as an aid is proper if the law is compatible with QTA’s purpose and will effectuate federal policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).