Vincent J. Krocka, Cross-Appellee v. City of Chicago, an Illinois Municipal Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that police department policy of “placing all officers taking Prozac into a disciplinary program” violated the ADA
• finding that the defendant’s comments were inextricably linked to the plaintiff’s disability discrimination claim because the comments were only offensive to the extent that they referred to the plaintiff’s disability
• observing that “[t]he steps taken to reassure an employer that an employee is fit for duty where there is a legitimate concern about an employee’s ability to perform a particular job” are not proof of unlawful discrimination
• dismissing plaintiff’s IIED claim because defendant’s comments were offensive only for referring to plaintiff’s disability
• dismissing plaintiff’s intentional infliction of emotional distress claim because defendant’s comments were offensive only for referring to plaintiff’s disability
• dismissing plaintiffs intentional infliction of emotional distress claim because defendant’s comments were offensive only for referring to plaintiff's disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).