Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Evidence that an employer has violated section 8(a)(1) of the Act can support an inference of anti-union animus.\
• “Evidence that an employer has violated section 8(a)(1) of the Act can support an inference of anti-union animus.”
• “We are even more deferential when reviewing the Board’s conclusions regarding discriminatory motive, because most evidence of motive is circumstantial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).