Skip to main content
· 7/28/2000

Vincent Henderson Daryelle Rexrode John Calella v. Stuart O. Simms Richard Lanham, Sr. William O. Filbert

Citations

  • 223 F.3d 267
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18181
  • 2000 WL 1039466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a “prisoner who is mistakenly released does not have a protected liberty interest because . . . he does not have a legitimate claim of entitlement to freedom”
  • noting that “[w]ith no liberty interest to protect, there is no violation of due process”
  • explaining that the court must “evaluate whether a reasonable official would have understood that the conduct at issue violated the clearly established right”
  • noting that “[w]ith no liberty interest to protect, there is no violation of due process”
  • explaining that the court must “evaluate whether a reasonable official would have understood that the conduct at issue violated the clearly established right”
  • “the fourth Amendment right to be free of arrest without probable cause is a clearly established constitutional right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luttig, Williams, Lee, Eastern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.