· 7/28/2000
Vincent Henderson Daryelle Rexrode John Calella v. Stuart O. Simms Richard Lanham, Sr. William O. Filbert
Citations
- 223 F.3d 267
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18181
- 2000 WL 1039466
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a “prisoner who is mistakenly released does not have a protected liberty interest because . . . he does not have a legitimate claim of entitlement to freedom”
- noting that “[w]ith no liberty interest to protect, there is no violation of due process”
- explaining that the court must “evaluate whether a reasonable official would have understood that the conduct at issue violated the clearly established right”
- noting that “[w]ith no liberty interest to protect, there is no violation of due process”
- explaining that the court must “evaluate whether a reasonable official would have understood that the conduct at issue violated the clearly established right”
- “the fourth Amendment right to be free of arrest without probable cause is a clearly established constitutional right.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Luttig, Williams, Lee, Eastern, Virginia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.