D.C. Circuit· 2/13/1969
Vincent E. Scott v. United States
Citations
- 419 F.2d 264
- 135 U.S. App. D.C. 377
- 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 8942
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court may not “create incentives for guilty pleas [in the bargaining process] by a policy of differential sentences”
- court may not \create incentives for guilty pleas [in the bargaining process] by a policy of differential sentences\
- defendant's statement during his pre-sentencing allocution inadmissible in later proceedings
- defendant’s statement during his pre-sentencing allocution inadmissible in later proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bazelon, Wright, Leventhal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
116 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 1,077×
- Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 759×
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 734×
- United States v. GraysonSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 708×
- William Jordan v. United States Department of JusticeD.C. Circuit· 1978-10-31· cited 440×
- Michael Alan Crooker v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & FirearmsD.C. Circuit· 1981-12-16· cited 289×
- United States v. Miguel SantiagoSeventh Circuit· 1978-08-22· cited 252×
- United States v. Janice Weston, A/K/A Janice WallaceNinth Circuit· 1971-09-03· cited 229×
- United States v. Jackie David MillerFirst Circuit· 1978-11-15· cited 223×
- State v. O'DellOhio Supreme Court· 1989-08-23· cited 174×
- Jimmy Frank v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryFifth Circuit· 1980-11-17· cited 143×
- Commonwealth v. BetheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-28· cited 119×
- Carl D. Pettyjohn v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-11-19· cited 104×
- United States v. Wincel HendrixSecond Circuit· 1974-10-15· cited 88×
- United States v. Jose AraujoSecond Circuit· 1976-07-26· cited 88×
- MENDEZBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1996-07-01· cited 83×
- United States v. Winfield L. Roberts, A/K/A WinD.C. Circuit· 1977-12-21· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-01-23· cited 80×
- United States v. Manuel R. SambroD.C. Circuit· 1971-10-26· cited 78×
- United States v. Harry William Daniels, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 1971-08-18· cited 77×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 3,789×
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court· 1963-06-17· cited 2,650×
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court· 1951-04-30· cited 1,907×
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court· 1948-06-14· cited 1,667×
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,645×
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court· 1968-04-08· cited 1,409×
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 1,174×
- Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 885×
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 837×
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 776×
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 697×
- Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 696×
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1951-04-23· cited 242×
- J. Paul Shelton v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1957-06-25· cited 236×
- Shelton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-03-10· cited 208×
- David Busby v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby PrisonFifth Circuit· 1966-01-31· cited 203×
- United States v. RosenbergSecond Circuit· 1952-04-08· cited 201×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.