Vincent DiVito, Inc. v. Vollmar Clay Products Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in granting a summary judgment in favor of the defendant on the plaintiffs claim for damages based on promissory estoppel because there was a genuine issue of material fact
• holding that the trial court erred in granting a summary judgment in favor of the defendant on the plaintiff's claim for damages based on promissory estoppel because there was a genuine issue of material fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).