Vincent Andrew Lopez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[f]rom the officers’ testimony that their lights and siren were activated for 0.6 miles or approximately one and one-half minutes, the jury could reasonably infer that Lopez was aware the officers were attempting to detain him but intended to flee to the driveway of his house”
• finding that the jury could have reasonably inferred that defendant knew officers were attempting to detain him when officer pursued the defendant with activated lights and sirens for about one and a half minutes
• “fleeing” is “anything less than prompt compliance with an officer’s direction to stop,” and “fleeing slowly is still fleeing”
• “‘[F]leeing’ is ‘anything less than prompt compliance with an officer’s direction to stop,’ and ‘fleeing slowly is still fleeing.’”
• “‘[F]leeing’ is ‘anything less than prompt compliance with an officer’s direction to stop,’ and ‘fleeing slowly is still fleeing.’”
• fact finder could reasonably infer defendant was aware law enforcement officers were attempting to detain him, but he intended to flee, where pursuing officers had their lights and sirens activated while following defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).