Viñas de Ramírez v. Cuevas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The letter sent on April 15, 1974 ... was an extrajudicial claim. On that date, a new one-year period of limitations began to run.”
• “One of the effects of the interruption of the limitation period is that it starts to run again from the beginning.”
• “The letter sent on April 15, 1974 ... was an extrajudicial claim. On that date, a new one-year period of limitations began to run.”
• “La reclamación no es efectiva si se hace en el vacío. Hay que hacerla al deudor. Es entonces cuando queda interrumpida extrajudicialmente la prescripción”
• “Efforts made and conversations had between the parties regarding a possible settlement, cannot be regarded as acknowledgment of a debt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).