Skip to main content
· 9/7/2011

Villines v. North Arkansas Regional Medical Center

Citations

  • 385 S.W.3d 360
  • 2011 Ark. App. 506
  • 2011 Ark. App. LEXIS 548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for a harm analysis after Court of Appeals failed to recognize error during voir dire process
  • noting in a different context that legislature’s use of “punished as” versus “punishable as” signals a significant distinction and that only “punished as” refers to how the offense was actually punished
  • “A trial court has broad discretion over the voir dire process, including setting reasonable limits and determining the propriety of a particular question.”
  • trial court has broad discretion over the voir dire process, including determining the propriety of a particular question
  • “Here, Appellant was not punished under Section 12.35(a). His prior state-jail felony had been enhanced, and he was punished for that offense under [former] Section 12.42(a)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abramson, Agree, Gruber, Robbins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.