· 9/7/2011
Villines v. North Arkansas Regional Medical Center
Citations
- 385 S.W.3d 360
- 2011 Ark. App. 506
- 2011 Ark. App. LEXIS 548
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for a harm analysis after Court of Appeals failed to recognize error during voir dire process
- noting in a different context that legislature’s use of “punished as” versus “punishable as” signals a significant distinction and that only “punished as” refers to how the offense was actually punished
- “A trial court has broad discretion over the voir dire process, including setting reasonable limits and determining the propriety of a particular question.”
- trial court has broad discretion over the voir dire process, including determining the propriety of a particular question
- “Here, Appellant was not punished under Section 12.35(a). His prior state-jail felony had been enhanced, and he was punished for that offense under [former] Section 12.42(a)(2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Abramson, Agree, Gruber, Robbins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.