Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/5/2006
Villescas v. State
Citations
- 189 S.W.3d 290
- 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 682
- 2006 WL 861008
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “appellant was given sufficient notice of the enhancement allegation” when the State filed and served a “notice of enhancement” 6 days before trial
- concluding that “appellant was given sufficient notice of the enhancement allegation” when the State filed and served a “notice of enhancement” 6 days before trial
- concluding that notice requirement dictated by Brooks is of constitutional origin
- holding that “when a defendant has no defense to the enhancement allegation and has not suggested the need for a continuance in order to prepare one, notice given at the beginning of the punishment phase satisfies the federal constitution”
- holding notice sufficient when defendant stipulated to the conviction and did not request a continuance
- stating that requiring notice to come before the trial on guilt ignores the possibility that the trial court could take measures to cure the notice problem by granting a continuance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keller, Price, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Johnson, Meyers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
145 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Parrott, Ex Parte Jimmie Mark Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-01-09· cited 129×
- Benson, Yusulf ShaheedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-04-15· cited 108×
- Mayfield v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2007-03-22· cited 74×
- Pelache v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-11-03· cited 72×
- Roberson, Crystal YvetteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-11-20· cited 51×
- Roberts v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-08-05· cited 42×
- Ketchum v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-08-10· cited 38×
- Johnson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2007-01-16· cited 29×
- Kivean Deshai Coffey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2014-06-13· cited 28×
- Hines v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-10-23· cited 25×
- Callison v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2007-03-14· cited 25×
- Hughen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-07-16· cited 21×
- Jose Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2018-07-02· cited 16×
- Fugate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-07-27· cited 15×
- Merlin James v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2012-04-19· cited 13×
- Billy Joe Garza v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-09-13· cited 9×
- Pelache v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2009-10-28· cited 8×
- Blount v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-07-27· cited 7×
- Carlos Zambrano v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2014-03-05· cited 7×
- Brenes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-03-23· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 1,736×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-11-26· cited 356×
- Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-10-21· cited 199×
- Hollins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-10-11· cited 160×
- Morman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1934-11-07· cited 53×
- Sears v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2002-11-20· cited 51×
- Fairrow v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2003-07-31· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.