Villegas v. Transamerica Financial Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding § 44–1522(A) applicable where plaintiffs were subjected to “an oral 10 inducement to take a loan, in which material facts are omitted”
• a reviewing court will only consider alternative theories that the trial court has not considered if the facts and inferences are clear
• “Courts have no right to remake contracts to comport with some unspecified notion of fairness nor to refuse enforcement on that ground.”
• “While a loan is ordinarily not thought of as a sale, in fact it is the sale of the 11 present use of money on a promise to repay in the future.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).