Villasenor v. Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that an evidentiary hearing is necessary to resolve certain factual disputes on a motion to dismiss for fraud, even where neither party requests the hearing
• meeting burden of establishing fraudulent conduct warranting dismissal by clear and convincing evidence “will almost always require an evidentiary hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Silva v. Wilcox
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-11-25· cited 21×
• Noe Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Company, Inc.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2017-05-04· cited 8×
• Gautreaux v. Maya
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-10· cited 5×
• Hair v. Morton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-12· cited 4×
• Etiany Maria Eloi Zufi v. Robin Gabriel Stockton and Ron Kendall Masonry, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-01-08

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cox v. Burke
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-23· cited 105×
• Majlinger v. Cassino Contracting Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-09-19· cited 29×
• Ruiz v. City of Orlando
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-21· cited 23×
• Veliz v. Rental Service Corp. USA, Inc.
  M.D. Florida· 2003-12-19· cited 21×
• Distefano v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-28· cited 18×
• Bologna v. Schlanger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-20· cited 17×
• Howard v. Risch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-11· cited 15×
• Cross v. Pumpco, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-14· cited 9×