Villarini-Garcia v. Hospital Del Maestro, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that varying diagnoses of different doctors, along with the reassurances of the negligent physician, “could have lulled a reasonable person into believing for a year or more that the operation had not been botched”
• holding that varying diagnoses of different doctors, along with the reassurances of the negligent physician, \could have lulled a reasonable person into believing for a year or more that the operation had not been botched\
• holding that varying diagnoses of different doctors, along with the reassurances of the negligent physician, \could have lulled a reasonable person into believing for a year or more that the operation had not been botched\
• noting that plaintiff \might be faulted\ for failing to inquire about the relationship between her earlier - 25 - surgery and current injury, but nevertheless declining to grant judgment as a matter of law on the question of timeliness
• where plaintiff had all the information necessary for a failure-to-warn claim, doctor’s subsequent reassurances would not excuse ■ plaintiffs lack of diligence in pursuing the claim
• where plaintiff had all the information necessary for a failure-to-warn claim, doctor's subsequent reassurances would not excuse plaintiff's lack of diligence in pursuing the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).