Skip to main content
· 4/20/1989

Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp.

Citations

  • 774 P.2d 213
  • 160 Ariz. 474
  • 34 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1989 Ariz. LEXIS 61

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that only biological and adoptive children may recover for loss of consortium resulting from parent’s injuries
  • recognizing child’s cause of action for loss of consortium with parent and noting that double recovery can be avoided by jury instructions and special verdicts
  • recognizing child’s cause of action for loss of consortium with parent and noting that double recovery can be avoided by jury instructions and special verdicts
  • recognizing child’s consortium claim despite Restatement rule that does not
  • requiring a showing that the injury is so severe as to destroy or nearly destroy the parent-child relationship
  • recognizing child's consortium claim despite Restatement rule that does not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Moeller, Holohan, Corcoran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.