· 4/20/1989
Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp.
Citations
- 774 P.2d 213
- 160 Ariz. 474
- 34 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 1989 Ariz. LEXIS 61
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that only biological and adoptive children may recover for loss of consortium resulting from parent’s injuries
- recognizing child’s cause of action for loss of consortium with parent and noting that double recovery can be avoided by jury instructions and special verdicts
- recognizing child’s cause of action for loss of consortium with parent and noting that double recovery can be avoided by jury instructions and special verdicts
- recognizing child’s consortium claim despite Restatement rule that does not
- requiring a showing that the injury is so severe as to destroy or nearly destroy the parent-child relationship
- recognizing child's consortium claim despite Restatement rule that does not
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Moeller, Holohan, Corcoran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.