Skip to main content
· 3/1/1916

Villar v. Coupe

Citations

  • 62 Pa. Super. 422
  • 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 442

Syllabus

<p>Affidavit of defense — Practice, C. P. — Contract—Principal and agent.</p> <p>In an action for cigars sold and delivered at different times, an affidavit of defense is insufficient which avers that an agent of the plaintiff agreed that defendant should pay for the cigars as he sold them, and return what he could not sell, and that he had offered to return the cigars unsold, without averring the exact language of the agreement, or that the agent had authority to make it, or when the alleged privileges of returning the unsold goods had been given.</p>

Judges: Bice, Head, Henderson, Kephaet, Orlady, Porter, Trexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.