Villanueva v. Itokazu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Board error in finding no new and material evidence to reopen disallowed claim does not require remand where Board “in fact” did reopen claim and deny it on merits
• holding harmless a Board finding of no new and material evidence when Board “in fact” reopened and adjudicated the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).