Village Park Mobile Home Ass'n Inc. v. State, Dept. of Business

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant established injury-in-fact by showing the real and immediate injury that it would not receive a refund of almost $150,000 as a result of AHCA’s action
• concluding that appellants’ “speculative concerns” did not demonstrate any immediate injury-in-fact, the feared results of an inaccurate, unfair prospectus had not happened, and a remedy other than the prospectus approval process existed if the feared results occurred
• reflecting that the petition’s allegations failed to demonstrate a real and immediate threat of direct injury
• speculations on the possible occurrence of injurious events are too remote to warrant inclusion in the administrative review process
• listing the statutory disclosure requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).