Village of Westfield, N.Y., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Welch's, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that causes of action under the Supremacy Clause \do not depend on the existence of a private right of action under the [preempting statute].\
• holding that absence of a res weighs against staying case pursuant to Colorado River doctrine
• recognizing that the appellate court has the authority to apply Colo- rado River test where the district court fails to do so in first instance
• holding that a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause “do[es] not depend on the existence of a private right of action under the [preempting statute]”
• determining that the state court proceeded at a \slow pace\ where it had \invested over thirteen years in the matter\
• finding that “the absence of federal issues does not strongly advise dismissal, unless the state law issues are novel or particularly complex”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).