Village of Tequesta v. Jupiter Inlet Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that restriction on landowner's water use \deprived [owner] of no beneficial use of the land itself\ and, thus, did not constitute a taking
• “[t]he ownership of land does not carry with it any ownership of vested rights to underlying ground water not actually diverted and applied to beneficial use”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).