Skip to main content
· 10/26/1962

Village of Edina v. Joseph

Citations

  • 264 Minn. 84
  • 119 N.W.2d 809
  • 1962 Minn. LEXIS 833

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing procedural parallels between special assessment appeals under chapter 429 and under the drainage laws
  • where supreme court reverses trial court’s vacation of assessments and remands for reentry of assessments there was no mention of discounting assessments made against developed properties
  • assessment statute cannot be extended to include right to a jury trial when no such right is explicitly granted by the statute
  • assessment affirmed where record did not establish it was “without integrity and faithful consideration by the municipal authorities or that it resulted from the adoption of inapplicable rules of law”
  • value enhanced for any purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.