Vilcinskas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing statute of limitations defense to be raised by motion to strike because parties agreed that complaint set forth all facts necessary to determine whether statute of limitations defense applied
• continuing course of conduct inapplicable where act completed by sale of air rifle
• continuing course of conduct inapplicable where act completed by sale of air rifle
• interpreting General Statutes [1949 Rev.] § 8324, predecessor to § 52-584
• allowing the statute of limitations defense to be raised by a motion to strike because the parties agreed that the complaint set forth all the facts necessary to determine whether the statute of limitations defense applied
• interpreting General Statutes [1949 Rev.] 8324, predecessor to § 52-584

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).