Skip to main content
· 5/31/1919

Vilas v. Bushnell

Citations

  • 107 Wash. 331

Syllabus

<p>Witnesses (44)—Competency—Transactions With Person Since Deceased. Evidence that a written statement given by deceased to witness had been lost, is not inadmissible as testimony of a transaction had with the deceased, where it was introduced to establish the existence of the contract.</p> <p>Husband and Wife (60, 65)—Gifts (8)—Community Property— Evidence—Sufficiency. Evidence that a husband delivered stock to his wife with the intent of making a gift, and that she received and continued to keep it in her possession and exercised and claimed ownership, sustains the burden of proving that it was voluntarily made and that the stock became her separate property.</p>

Judges: MacKintosh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.