Vikingstad v. Baggott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a verbal agreement between two people benefitting a third person created an agreement that the third person could enforce
• oral agreement to pay back $1,000 obtained by virtue of a previous earnest money agreement held not merged in a later earnest money agreement
• donee-beneficiary may enforce the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).