Skip to main content
· 9/18/1997

Vikell Investors Pacific, Inc. v. Kip Hampden Ltd.

Citations

  • 946 P.2d 589
  • 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1983
  • 1997 Colo. App. LEXIS 212
  • 1997 WL 578171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A general objection to an instruction is not sufficient to preserve a specific objection for appeal.”
  • “[C] ounsel must state the specific grounds of his or her objections for consideration of the court and only the groun ds so specified shall be considered on appeal. ”
  • “[C] ounsel must state t he specific grounds of his or her objections for consideration of the court and only the grounds so specified shall be considered on appeal. ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davidson, Sternberg, Plank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.