Skip to main content
· 5/22/2013

Vijil v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.

Citations

  • 427 S.W.3d 796
  • 2013 Ark. App. 346
  • 2013 WL 2250507
  • 2013 Ark. App. LEXIS 361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that a party’s inventory must be admitted into evidence before “it may . . . be considered as evidence of a property’s characterization of value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agree, Glover, Gruber, Vaught

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.