Skip to main content
· 4/25/1991

Viirre v. Zayre Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 571 N.E.2d 209
  • 212 Ill. App. 3d 505
  • 156 Ill. Dec. 622
  • 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • entering Rule 304(a) language does not make an order final and appealable if the order was not in fact final
  • entering Rule 304(a) language does not make an order final and appealable if the order was not already final
  • mere pendency of negotiations conducted in good faith insufficient to estop defendant from relying on statute of limitations as a defense
  • the fact that “the trial court made a finding pursuant to Rule 304(a) does not necessarily mean that the order was final and appealable if the order was not in fact final”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.