Vigneaux v. Segura

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a miscalculation of the prior record score “constitutes a challenge to the discretionary aspects” of a sentence (citation omitted)
• holding that a miscalculation of the prior record score “constitutes a challenge to the discretionary aspects of [a] sentence.”
• holding that appellant waived challenge to discretionary aspects of sentence where he failed to include in his brief a Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f) Statement
• holding miscalculation of prior record score “constitutes a challenge to the discretionary aspects of [a] sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).