Vigiletti v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for unjust enrichment because there was no allegation that the benefits that the members of the plaintiffs’ class received were less than what they bargained for”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Bisphenol-A (BPA) Polycarbonate Plastic Products Liability Litigation
  W.D. Missouri· 2011-07-05· cited 41×
• Mancuso v. Rubin
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-06-10· cited 26×
• Ballas v. Virgin Media, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-03-10· cited 11×
• Lazaroff v. Paraco Gas Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2012-05-15· cited 1×
• Vigiletti v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-07-17

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1999-10-26· cited 346×
• Smith v. Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-04-15· cited 38×
• Lesesne v. Lesesne
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-03-18· cited 16×
• Donahue v. Ferolito, Vultaggio & Sons
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-12-02· cited 15×
• Nadkarni v. North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-08-01· cited 15×
• 527 Smith Street Brooklyn Corp. v. Bayside Fuel Oil Depot Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-06-01· cited 11×
• Rice v. Penguin Putnam, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-12-10· cited 8×

Other cases named Vigiletti v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Vigiletti v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-07-17