Skip to main content

Vigil v. People

Citations

  • 300 P.2d 545
  • 134 Colo. 126
  • 1956 Colo. LEXIS 223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a defendant's vague Colorado Constitutional objection did not warrant the Court's consideration on appeal
  • noting that a defendant's vague Colorado Constitutional objection did not warrant the Court's consideration on appeal
  • defendant argued that he should not have been required to wear a mask at robbery trial in order for witnesses to identify him
  • to preserve objection for appeal, objection \must be stated with sufficient particularity as to call the attention of the court to the specific point\
  • defendant’s constitutional rights were not violated by requiring him to wear a mask at trial so that a witness could identify him from the manner in which he appeared on the night of the alleged robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.