Vigil v. Leavitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “three racially motivated comments directed at [the plaintiff] . . . ‘do not amount to actionable harassment’” (citation omitted)
• holding that “three racially motivated comments directed at [the plaintiff] . . . ‘d[id] not amount to actionable harassment’” (citation omitted)
• holding that three racially motivated comments over the course of five years of employment were “the sort of isolated acts that courts have consistently rejected as the 12 basis for supporting Title VII claims”
• finding that discriminatory statements made by non-decisionmakers could not be inferred to have influenced the adverse employment action despite the non-decisionmakers being frequent companions of the decisionmakers
• affirming summary judgment where the plaintiff \point[ed] to only three racially motivated comments directed at him during a one-year period” and where \the remaining evidence ... bears no connection to his race”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).