Vigil v. California Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Court has permitted stacking \on the rationale that separate premiums for separate coverages entitle the insured to the benefit of what he or she has paid for\
• likening medical pay coverage to “ ‘limited personal accident insurance’ which, like uninsured motorist coverage (and subject to any explicit policy limitations or exclusions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).