Vigers & Co. v. Carlon, F. M. C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to dismiss the plaintiff’s state law whistleblower claim that “neither pertain[ed] to a right created by the CBA itself nor call[ed] for analysis of the CBA”
• granting defendants’ motion to dismiss Title VII gender discrimination and sexual harassment claims (Counts I, andIII) for, inter alia, failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and denying dismissal of Title VII retaliation claim (Count II

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).