View Ridge Estates Hoa, Resps V. Walter Guetter, Apps

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \pollution exclusion unambiguously and explicitly applies to exclude coverage\ and therefore, insurer had no duty to defend
• holding that a nearly identical pollution exclusion clause barred coverage for injury caused by the inhalation of manganese fumes released by welding
• applying District of Columbia law and finding the provision unambiguous as applied to welders exposed to manganese fumes because it contains “neither technical terms nor terms of art”
• considering excess insurer’s duty to defend
• applying District of Columbia law
• applying District of Columbia law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).