Skip to main content
· 2/8/2000

Viet Vu v. Kendall (In Re Viet Vu)

Citations

  • 245 B.R. 644
  • 43 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1443
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1895
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 2655
  • 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 196
  • 35 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 223
  • 2000 WL 267073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an 14 offer to buy an asset can show that it is not burdensome
  • explaining that an 14 offer to buy an asset can show that it is not burdensome
  • explaining that an 14 offer to buy an asset can show that it is not burdensome
  • “The Ninth Circuit has consistently held without limitation that under § 541(a)(6), the estate is entitled to postpetition appreciation.”
  • “[T]he court’s decision to authorize or deny abandonment is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” (quoting Johnston v. Webster (In re Johnston), 49 F.3d 538, 540 (9th Cir. 1995)); DeVore v. Marshack (In re DeVore), 223 B.R. 193, 198 (9th Cir. BAP 1998
  • reviewing 4 abandonment order for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Meyers, Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.