Viestenz v. Arthur Township

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating whether a township board followed “good engineering practices ... to reestablish the natural flow of such waters ... is a question of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Huber v. Oliver County
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-12-01· cited 31×
• Rynestad v. Clemetson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1965-03-04· cited 13×
• Martin v. Weckerly
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-03-13· cited 8×
• Ness v. Ward County Water Resource District
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-10-30· cited 7×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Viestenz v. Arthur Township
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1952-07-29· cited 20×
• Ritter v. Drainage District No. 1
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1947-11-28· cited 10×
• Halsrud v. Brodale
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1956-07-26· cited 1×