Vierria v. California Highway Patrol

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting as cognizable injuries alleged damages of “lost past and future 11 income, sick leave, annual leave and personal stress leave benefits, loss of employment and career 12 opportunities”
• “The relevant portions of the statute clearly indicate that [section 1102.5] is meant to establish prohibited activity by employers, rather than individuals.”
• “The relevant portions of the statute clearly indicate that [1102.5] is meant to establish prohibited activity by employers, rather than individuals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).