Viera v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• confirming that habitual offender sentences are not subject to sentencing guidelines and thus are not departure sentences that must be accompanied by written reasons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tannehill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-30· cited 3×
• Curry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-02· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Heggs v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-17· cited 853×
• Trapp v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-01· cited 249×
• Toomajan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-08· cited 14×
• Nelson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-16· cited 3×
• Willis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-21· cited 2×
• Saldane v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-26· cited 1×