Skip to main content
· 7/9/1992

Viera Prochotsky, Cross-Appellee v. Baker & McKenzie Cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 966 F.2d 333
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15511
  • 59 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,619
  • 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 418
  • 1992 WL 156686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s denial of motion for Rule 11 sanctions where plaintiff’s Title VII complaint was barred by res judicata
  • noting that this “prevents vexatious litigation”
  • noting that this “prevents vexatious litigation”
  • identity of cause of action exists when \a single core of operative facts forms the basis of both lawsuits\
  • “Even though one group of facts may give rise to different claims for relief upon different theories of recovery, there remains a single cause of action.... Once a transaction has caused injury, all claims arising from that transaction must be brought in one suit or be lost”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.