Vielma v. Eureka Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disagreeing that “right to sue” letter issued by EEOC is interchangeable with “right to file a civil action” letter issued by Commission
• recognizing that pursuant to a Worksharing Agreement between the EEOC and the TWC, each agency is “the other[’s] . . . agent for the purpose of receiving and drafting charges, including those that are not jurisdictional with the agency that initially receives the charges”
• although court has “virtually unlimited discretion to allow amendments before the entry of judgment, that discretion narrows considerably after entry of judgment”
• “Post-judgment amendment to a complaint can only occur once the judgment itself is vacated under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 or 60.” (cleaned up)
• “[W]e have consistently upheld the denial of leave to amend where the party seeking to amend has not clearly established that [it] could not reasonably have raised the new matter prior to the trial court’s merits ruling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).