Vieira v. First American Title Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(d) “permits Plaintiffs to plead alternative and even inconsistent legal theories, such as breach of contract and unjust enrichment, even if Plaintiffs only can recover under one of these theories”
• noting that Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d) permits plaintiffs to “plead alternative and even inconsistent legal theories, such as breach of contract and unjust enrichment” even where plaintiffs “only can recover under one of these theories”
• stating that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(d) “permits Plaintiffs to plead alternative and even inconsistent legal theories, such as breach of contract and unjust enrichment, even if Plaintiffs only can recover under one of these theories”
• noting that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(d) permits plaintiffs to “plead alternative and even inconsistent legal theories, such as breach of contract and unjust enrichment” even where plaintiffs can “only recover under one of these theories”
• stating that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(d) “permits Plaintiffs to plead alternative and even inconsistent legal theories, such as breach of contract and unjust enrichment, even if Plaintiffs only can recover under one of these theories”
• finding Plaintiffs fail to state an alternative claim under unjust enrichment without a clear demonstration of certain elements of the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).