Skip to main content
· 1/22/2007

Vieira v. AGM, II, LLC

Citations

  • 366 B.R. 532
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18936
  • 2007 WL 1020835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “even if the district court must review some issues decided by the Bankruptcy Court de novo, such a review is not ... a waste of judicial resources”
  • noting importance of core/non-core distinction in permissive withdrawal analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.