Viegle v. City of Spokane
Citations
- 78 Wash. 359
- 139 P. 33
- 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1024
Syllabus
<p>Municipal Corporations — Public Improvements — Assessments— Benefits — Evidence—Sufficiency. The evidence sustains findings that property upon a bluff was not benefited by a public improvement consisting of grading, bridging, and the construction of a retaining wall, including a subway under an electric railway, where it appears that the subway, having a ten per cent grade, was of no practical value to the lands, which were reached by other roads on a four per cent grade.</p> <p>Same — Assessments—Review. Under 3 Rem. & Bal. Code, § 7892-1 et seq., authorizing the assessment of property specially benefited by a local improvement, and Id., § 7892-22, providing that, on appeal from the city council, the court shall confirm, correct, modify, or annul the assessment in so far as the same affects the property of the appellant, the court may set aside an assessment as arbitrary and made upon a fundamentally wrong basis, where it appears that the property assessed was not benefited at all by the improvement.</p>
Judges: Chadwick, Crow, Ellis, Gose, Main
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.