Viedt v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on New York’s admission criteria to determine that recovering alcoholics residing in a “halfway house” were statutorily “handicapped” and “disabled”
• reversing grant of summary judgment as to organization’s ADA claims, after it presented evidence that defendants denied it a permit to open halfway houses for its proposed clients, recovering alcoholics, whom evidence showed were disabled under ADA
• “Because the plaintiffs do not point to the prerequisite neutral application of a rule, they fail to state a claim under a reasonable accommodation theory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).