Second Circuit· 3/4/1996
Video Tutorial Services, Inc. v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation
Citations
- 79 F.3d 3
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3822
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that a controversy is capable of repetition yet evading review
- noting that plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that a controversy is capable of repetition yet evading review
- explaining that “speculat[ing]” that “lightning may strike” again is not enough
- “An interlocutory appeal from a temporary stay no longer in effect . . . is the paradigm of a moot appeal.”
- “We are. . . reluctant to deny the district court deference in cases like this, where it has not yet had the chance to determine the validity of the arbitration clause at issue or the arbitrability of the dispute itself.”’
- “[W]e have no jurisdiction over moot controversies.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McLaughlin, Leval, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. v. BelandSecond Circuit· 2011-11-03· cited 231×
- Pharmachemie B.V. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2002-01-18· cited 107×
- David Lawrence v. J. Kenneth Blackwell, Secretary, State of OhioSixth Circuit· 2005-12-16· cited 85×
- Ramirez v. Sanchez RamosFirst Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 63×
- Allstate Insurance v. ElzanatyE.D. New York· 2013-03-11· cited 52×
- Dennin v. Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference, Inc.Second Circuit· 1996-08-30· cited 39×
- Chirco v. Gateway Oaks, L.L.C.Sixth Circuit· 2004-09-14· cited 24×
- Members for a Better Union v. BevonaSecond Circuit· 1998-07-15· cited 24×
- Altman v. Bedford Central School DistrictSecond Circuit· 2001-03-27· cited 8×
- Chirco v. Gateway OaksSixth Circuit· 2004-09-14· cited 6×
- McGinty v. State of NYN.D. New York· 1998-07-22· cited 3×
- Meierhenry Sargent LLP v. Bradley WilliamsEighth Circuit· 2021-03-24· cited 3×
- Muhammad v. City Of New York Department Of CorrectionsSecond Circuit· 1997-09-26· cited 2×
- Hameed v. CoughlinN.D. New York· 1999-02-02· cited 2×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Platinum Investment Corp.Second Circuit· 2004-04-08· cited 2×
- Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons International Ass'n v. International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied TradesE.D. New York· 1997-02-07· cited 1×
- Pharmachemie B V v. Henney, JaneD.C. Circuit· 2002-01-18
- Dennin v. Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic ConferenceSecond Circuit· 1996-08-30
- Members for Better Union v. BevonaSecond Circuit· 1998-07-15
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,797×
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court· 1936-12-07· cited 5,442×
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 3,053×
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court· 1981-04-29· cited 2,376×
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 2,029×
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court· 1982-04-26· cited 1,805×
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-11-16· cited 1,710×
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court· 1975-12-16· cited 1,702×
- Norman v. ReedSupreme Court· 1992-01-14· cited 538×
- Collins & Aikman Products Co. v. Building Systems, Inc. And U.S. Commercial Floor SystemSecond Circuit· 1995-06-15· cited 290×
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployesSupreme Court· 1987-04-28· cited 208×
- Sample v. JohnsonNinth Circuit· 1985-09-20· cited 131×
- Lee v. Schmidt-WenzelNinth Circuit· 1985-07-26· cited 74×
- Brooks v. Georgia State Board of ElectionsEleventh Circuit· 1995-07-17· cited 62×
- Sample v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1986-02-24· cited 60×
- B & B Chemical Company, Inc., W.B. Brock, Jr. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency DefendantsEleventh Circuit· 1986-12-22· cited 37×
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1980-03-21· cited 27×
- Leesona Corporation v. Cotwool Manufacturing Corporation, Judson Mills Division, Deering Milliken Research Corporation, and Whitin MacHine WorksFourth Circuit· 1963-03-19· cited 25×
- Arvida Corporation v. Honorable Sidney Sugarman, United States District Judge, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arvida CorporationSecond Circuit· 1958-10-02· cited 16×
- New England Health Care Employees Union, District 1199, Seiu Afl-Cio v. Mount Sinai HospitalSecond Circuit· 1995-09-11· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.