Skip to main content
· 3/4/1996

Video Tutorial Services, Inc. v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation

Citations

  • 79 F.3d 3
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that a controversy is capable of repetition yet evading review
  • noting that plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that a controversy is capable of repetition yet evading review
  • explaining that “speculat[ing]” that “lightning may strike” again is not enough
  • “An interlocutory appeal from a temporary stay no longer in effect . . . is the paradigm of a moot appeal.”
  • “We are. . . reluctant to deny the district court deference in cases like this, where it has not yet had the chance to determine the validity of the arbitration clause at issue or the arbitrability of the dispute itself.”’
  • “[W]e have no jurisdiction over moot controversies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin, Leval, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.